AI Compliance Isn’t Optional: How Business Leaders Must Navigate the Evolving Regulatory Landscape

Artificial Intelligence isn’t just an emerging trend anymore—it’s reshaping industries, business practices, and regulations at a pace that’s hard to keep up with. After attending various AI seminars, discussing with professionals in the space, and reading countless articles/cases about AI's developments, one thing is clear: business leaders can’t be passive. AI is transforming operations, decision-making, and compliance. My key takeaway from all of it is that before integrating AI into your business—regardless of its form or capacity—it's important for you to understand the regulatory landscape and the necessary steps for both adoption and ongoing compliance.

For example, states like New Jersey, New York, and California have enacted laws ensuring AI-driven hiring doesn’t violate anti-discrimination laws. In fact, New Jersey’s latest guidance states AI bias is illegal discrimination, even if unintentional. Companies using AI in hiring, screening, or performance management are responsible for any discriminatory impact. Transparency is also a growing focus, with states pushing for businesses to notify candidates and employees when AI is used in decision-making. To be frank, AI regulation in the business realm isn’t just about hiring or marketing (as we currently see/hear)—it’s expanding into finance, healthcare, housing, and consumer protection.

Meanwhile, the current administration is shaping AI policy and regulation. President Trump recently announced up to $500 billion in private sector AI infrastructure investment through a joint venture called Stargate, involving executives from OpenAI, SoftBank, and Oracle. The initiative aims to accelerate AI infrastructure development and create over 100,000 American jobs (mainly in TX it seems). While details are still emerging, this signals a major push to keep AI innovation domestic. However, figures like Elon Musk have cast doubts on the actual funding secured, highlighting ongoing debates over AI regulation and investment.

Beyond employment laws regulating AI, AI governance is now a boardroom issue. Publicly held companies face new fiduciary obligations around AI oversight. Courts are expanding the duty of supervision, meaning executives must implement and monitor AI policies effectively (peep DE's recent legal updates). Those failing to oversee AI risks could face personal liability, much like financial mismanagement claims. Companies should establish AI oversight committees, bringing together legal, HR, compliance, and tech teams. Indeed, regular AI compliance training is becoming as essential as cybersecurity awareness—just like investing in strong cybersecurity insurance without skimping on coverage limits.

No matter how you code it or train it, AI is here to stay, and businesses have to navigate this shifting landscape wisely. Whether you're a founder, in-house counsel, or executive, your approach to AI risk management today will define your company's future.

Previous
Previous

Cash for Keys: Don’t Get Locked Out of Compliance in CaliforniA

Next
Next

Rodriguez v. Lawrence Equipment: A Win for Employers in Limiting PAGA Claims through Arbitration